Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 02:59:13 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Michael Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, scott_long@btc.adaptec.com, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com, obrien@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: asr can not map memory? Message-ID: <3CA6EC01.2878918B@mindspring.com> References: <200203311012.g2VACOc04299@mass.dis.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Smith wrote: > > Yeah, you do. I fully understood _that_ context; I think Mike > > was talking about other context. It's pretty clear to me that > > ranges ought to be per bridge chipset, rather than global... I > > thought that that was what the option was working around: that > > they were not. > > I can't imagine how you came to this conclusion. You won't get it from > reading the code, or from understanding how PCI works. Maybe you need > sleep too. I got it from assuming that reading the code didn't tell me how the code was supposed to work, because if it had, then this would never had been a discussion, because the code would always do the right thing. 8-). My 1.0 copy of the PCI-PCI bridge documentation doesn't say that what Alfred's system is doing is bad; maybe it's just outdated. > The problem is twofold: > > - The code is broken, it fails to take into account both prefetched and > non-prefetched bridge mappings. It also appears to miscompute the > start of one of the attempted range accesses. Cool... this is the bug description I was fishing for here. > - There is anecdotal evidence that some bridges pass ranges other than > those advertised in their mappings, so even if the first problem is > resolved, enforcing correctness may result in occasional lossage. This sounds like a job for a "panic: anecdotal is real!" that Alfred could jam into the code, since he has the magic hardware. > And, since you ask, the whole reason behind having this code in the > first place is that we need to be able to correctly assign resources for > devices behind bridges. Yeah; it was the "it not doing it for Alfred's weird hardware" thing that threw me off. 8-) 8-). > I got run over by a car last time I worked on this code. Time for > someone else to pick it up. Oh yeah, we're *all* going to jump on hacking that code, now that you told us it's cursed! }B^D. Alfred, since you have the hardware that can (maybe) prove the anedote real, and can demonstrably show that Mike's problem #1 is fixed, once it's fixed... care to brave the curse? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CA6EC01.2878918B>