Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 17:29:29 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: peter@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grodvi Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grohtml Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grolbp Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grolj4 Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grops Makefile ... Message-ID: <20020407.172929.32777631.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <200204070240.g372etI53642@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200204070240.g372etI53642@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200204070240.g372etI53642@freefall.freebsd.org>
Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Add -lstdc++ to the link args for these C++ tools so that they can be
: compiled with gcc-3.1. Somebody thought it was a good idea to move
: the implementation of new and delete from libgcc to libstdc++. This
: change doesn't harm the current compiler in the tree.
Is this a band-aid until the compiler can be fixed, or a real solution
long term?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020407.172929.32777631.imp>