Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 03:46:01 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h src/sys/netinet6 in6.h Message-ID: <yge1ydnfl3q.wl@mille.mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <20020410142136.B70911@espresso.q9media.com> References: <200204101159.g3ABx2e55901@freefall.freebsd.org> <yge662zfpay.wl@mille.mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:21:36 -0400
>>>>> Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> said:
mike> It isn't required, it's a matter of correctness. There was no need
mike> for them to be conditional in the first place; it was a mistake on my
mike> part to make them conditional.
Okay, I see. But, now, both include/arpa/inet.h and sys/netinet/in.h
/ sys/netinet/in.h have same defines explicitly. It seems nasty for
applications which includes both arpa/inet.h and netinet/in.h.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge1ydnfl3q.wl>