Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:34:27 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Avalos <pavalos@theshell.com>, <freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: df -t option Message-ID: <20020424013035.A12579-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020423200510.A1738@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Tim J. Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > I agree. In -stable, -T could become an alias for -t, and using -t > > instead of -T could result in a warning noting its deprecated status. > > I did something similar when I added the -p option to whois(1). > > A quick grep shows that the mount(8) and umount(8) utilities, but nothing > else, use -t to specify the filesystem type. What do you propose be done Also fsck. > with these utilities? Leaving mount/umount alone seems like the right thing > to do to me, but it may also be confusing. Leaving df -t alone seems right to me. df -t is a bit newer than mount -t though. It wasn't in FreeBSD-1. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020424013035.A12579-100000>