Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:31:44 +0900
From:      Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To:        hsu@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeffrey Hsu)
Cc:        bright@mu.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Subject:   Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1
Message-ID:  <200204281032.g3SAViPw081981@silver.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20020425180432.C369237B400@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <20020425175540.GN38320@elvis.mu.org> <20020425180432.C369237B400@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:04:32 -0700 (PDT),
  hsu@FreeBSD.ORG (Jeffrey Hsu) said:

hsu> If you compare the two approaches, the BSD/OS approach is simpler
hsu> because it is coarse.  You're confusing finer grain locking with
hsu> better.

Well, maybe my patch just seems more fine-grained than BSD/OS because
I have locked down only a part of the data in a socket.  When all of
the data in a socket is locked down, my work should look more coarser
than now.

-- 
Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204281032.g3SAViPw081981>