Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:17:50 -0700 From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, Aragon Gouveia <aragon@phat.za.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -PRERELEASE (was: Difference between RELENG_* and RELENG_*_BP) Message-ID: <200205022317.g42NHomS074415@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020502230228.GA53240@peitho.fxp.org> References: <200205022047.g42Klxb84582@hokkshideh2.jetcafe.org> <3CD1ACD6.5B2432DF@mindspring.com> <200205022128.g42LSXjr072995@intruder.bmah.org> <3CD1B790.DB547674@mindspring.com> <200205022218.g42MI6c4073672@intruder.bmah.org> <014f01c1f22b$33c1f7f0$01000001@aragon> <200205022258.g42MwjcW074190@intruder.bmah.org> <20020502230228.GA53240@peitho.fxp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > Yep, though it mentions -BETA instead of -PRERELEASE: > > http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/admin.html#RELEASE-CANDIDATE > > and should probably be updated if re@ is going to use > -PRERELEASE consistently. That explains why grep didn't find it. :-) It should be updated in either case, as we've used "PRERELEASE" for 4.4, 4.5, and (now) 4.6. As far as "consistently" goes, I'd say we've got a much better chance of doing that, thanks largely to Murray writing down most of the steps in the process. I'll deal with this. Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205022317.g42NHomS074415>