Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 22:35:05 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth <hanspeter_roth@hotmail.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mounting linprocfs gives error Message-ID: <20020504223505.A47227@bsag.ch> In-Reply-To: <20020504032603.A8812@mail.clubplus.net>; from david@skytrackercanada.com on Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:26:03AM -0400 References: <20020503111257.A3919@mail.clubplus.net> <20020503180233.A16817@bsag.ch> <20020503160632.A89782@mail.clubplus.net> <20020503224426.A39765@bsag.ch> <20020504032603.A8812@mail.clubplus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 04 at 03:26, David Banning spoke: > > It seems you have upgrade the kernel to 4.5Stable. > That's where I am too. > > > I don't know whether modules are impacted by the userland programs. > what's a 'userland' program? Userland programs are those that are not kernel nor kernel loaded modules. They have some code running in user mode but call systemcalls for specific tasks. These are in /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin but also the library calls of shared object libraries run in user mode. > > > Just curious: have you also made installworld? > Yes. Ok. Just to be sure this can't be the cause. > > Are there strange boot message near `additional ABI support:'? > > (ScrollLock PgUp) > No. > > > Does `ls /proc` look reasonable? > > su-2.03# ls /proc > 0/ 174/ 230/ 304/ 58/ > 1/ 2/ 231/ 306/ 6/ [...] > 16991/ 225/ 289/ 4/ curproc@ [...] > > No sure what reasonable is in this case. It looks reasonable. It's not empty. It seems all processes have a directory here. (I don't know whether linprocfs depends on procfs.) > > Is /compat/linux/proc a directory? > yes. > > > I have linux_base-6.1 port installed. > Me too. I can't think of another cause now. Sorry. -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020504223505.A47227>