Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:26 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Anders Nordby <anders@FreeBSD.org>, Udo Schweigert <udo.schweigert@siemens.com> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020504140225.GB73078@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <20020504135223.GA7869@totem.fix.no> References: <200205041331.g44DV7B82036@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020504134821.GA73078@madman.nectar.cc> <20020504135223.GA7869@totem.fix.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Anders Nordby wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:48:21AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > >> Use ncurses instead of slang by default, because of slang "out of a box" > >> issues. > > What was the issue/were the issues? They are not described in the PR. > > See PR ports/37725, which it refers to. Thanks, I missed that reference. Hmpf, my experience is completely the opposite. I use over 83 `color' settings with mutt using slang. Before the port defaulted to slang, I would manually specify WITH_SLANG because the ncurses version did not do colors well. (on -CURRENT and -STABLE) I just tested mutt with slang with the `color' definitions in ports/37725 on rxvt (TERM=rxvt) and xterm (TERM=xterm-color) on 4.5-STABLE, and as expected it works fine. Did the maintainer or committer actually test to see if Luigi's claim is accurate? I would like to see this resolved before 4.6-RELEASE so that we have a working mutt on the CDs. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020504140225.GB73078>