Date: 06 May 2002 13:22:11 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: xdm broken on current Message-ID: <xzpy9exwmfw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020505230113.W4305-100000@master.gorean.org> References: <20020505230113.W4305-100000@master.gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yep, these modules don't exist in -STABLE. You should keep your old > > /etc/pam.conf around for -STABLE programs. > I thought that pam ignored pam.conf if /etc/pam.d exists? -CURRENT's PAM does, -STABLE's doesn't. > Or are > you saying that I should make /etc/pam.d/xdm look just like the old > settings? I'm happy to test ideas to try and make this work, but I don't > really know anything about pam. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpy9exwmfw.fsf>