Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:44:19 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, imp@village.org, bts@babbleon.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My position on commiters guide 10.4.4 Message-ID: <20020524174419.GA4565@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020523144707.A99392@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20020522134124.GA98620@nagual.pp.ru> <200205232031.g4NKVF9c009501@Magelan.Leidinger.net> <20020523144707.A99392@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 14:47:07 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:31:15PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On 22 Mai, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > >=20 > > >> We are not protected against every possible attack, but we are at le= ast > > >> safe against some of them. > > >=20 > > > Well, it is always easy to assign task needed to be done to somebody = else, > > > saying - he (porter) must do part of security officer work. Do you wa= nt to > > > do it by yourself, for example, instead of poiting on somebody else (= me)? > > > If yes, we can announce excellent new position "ports security office= r" =20 > > > for such type of work. > >=20 > > That's a full time job for more than one person. > >=20 > > I follow the rule for the ports I maintain. I don't have a problem with > > it. And it seems you are the only one voting for the removal of the > > rule. So if you don't want to life with the rule, I suggest to you to > > not update ports where you have to follow the rule. At least this is > > what I would do if I do not want to follow the rule. >=20 > I think that's the best advice. In case some of you not read my original message to the end, here is the=20 quote indicating that this advice is originally mine: Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > In case this rule stays as is, I forced to officially declare that I=20 > will not touch any re-rolled port anymore until its version number will= =20 > be changed, since following 10.4.4 rule is against principles of common= =20 > sense in form I have them. --=20 Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBPO578+JgpPLZnQjrAQHToAP9HoblcHmqvCZXmk4X7JfxqaPQr/cKkEkI 8eGFZQs1vQfa4oO/DZR2EOV0mTCkH13TVvwr8tIPZh89lwzab/412+FAWxlzd+Bb xsrcd8ZtoQeVCWFi1sPBfXK60YuYR9bu2ShSW7K7b7McMsDzKDeE0dNuQ2zVF5Vu m2e3woHElLo= =Zogz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020524174419.GA4565>