Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:30:09 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why don't we search /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include by default? Message-ID: <20020529093009.C31668@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20020528084248.B59588@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020528143444.R16567@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020528084248.B59588@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 28 May 2002 at 8:42:48 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:34:44PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I've just had a question from some friends in the Linux space about >> why we install additional libraries in /usr/local/lib and their header >> files in /usr/local/include, but gcc by default only searches >> /usr/local/libexec and /usr/local/lib for libraries and /usr/include > > The system GCC searching any part of /usr/local is a bug. It is not > [ports] PREFIX clean. So how would you recommend we solve the issue? > (you have typos above about /usr/local/libexec don't you?) Yes, sorry. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529093009.C31668>