Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      03 Jun 2002 12:53:17 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org, admins@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: i386 tinderbox failure
Message-ID:  <xzpk7pg4orm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20020603074326.GC37191@sunbay.com>
References:  <200206020436.g524ae9Z003471@ref5.freebsd.org> <20020603074326.GC37191@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> I'm doing the daily (-j8) snapshots on a 2-CPU SMP machine for
> i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64, and never saw this problem.
> Could it be that you have a faulty hardware on your tinderbox,
> as I already saw a few reports from you, always in a different
> place?

I was wondering about that too...  Admins, any signs of faulty RAM or
cooling problems in ref5?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk7pg4orm.fsf>