Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:35:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Gary Thorpe <gat7634@hotmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiple threads for interrupts Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206211834120.38383-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020622011122.GF37053@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't know yet if the problem occurs with no threaded apps I don't think so... I'd like to commit in a couple of days but I'd also like to get this sort of problem out first.. On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> [020621 17:40] wrote: > > I have a tricky linked list (read thread run queue) corruption problem > > I''ve been chasing for a couple of days.. > > > > it only shows up under moderate load.. e.g. 20 threaded processes, each > > with > > 3 kernel threads. > > I'm closing in though.. > > Does it cause problems when no threads are active (just processes)? > Basically I'd love to see this committed already if the base stability > issues are mostly cleaned up. If threads cause issues then that's > ok isn't it? > > -Alfred > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0206211834120.38383-100000>