Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:51:51 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Martin Faxer <gmh003532@brfmasthugget.se>, David Greenman-Lawrence <dg@root.com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_syscalls.c Message-ID: <20020625193929.X26196-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020624213441.33750380E@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > Martin Faxer wrote: > > what actually prompted me to write the nsendfile() thing was > > that I quickly checked syscalls.master and saw entries for n[lf]stat(). > > upon checking more closely that might be something else though, and not > > related at all to "new" stat() functions, I'm not sure... > > Those are NetBSD [lf]stat() syscalls using a [stale] NetBSD style struct > stat. They use other syscalls these days so they are a bit silly now. Can we remove these? They are not even 100% compatible with the stale NetBSD one now, since struct nstat has a st_createtimespec in it and the "n" stat functions fill this in. Mismaintaining this mainly wasted time. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020625193929.X26196-100000>