Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 05:28:50 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs(1) bug? with cvs update -rX -DY Message-ID: <20020630022849.GA731@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20020630104853W.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20020626022052V.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020626024424P.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020629171822.GC5643@hades.hell.gr> <20020630104853W.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-06-30 10:48 +0000, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > keramida> So, the proper steps to get the files of a branch other than HEAD, in > keramida> the revisions they had at a certain point in time would be: > > keramida> + Checkout using the branch as a sticky tag. > keramida> + Update using both -D DATE and -r BRANCH_TAG. > > No, it doesn't work as you said. The second "cvs update" will delete > all lukemftpd files (see my previous email posted to hackers@). > > Would you please try same operations to src/contrib/lukemftpd? Ah, hummm. Perhaps this is because no files have been taken off the vendor branch. I see that the latest revision of lukemftpd.h (for instance) is 1.1.1.2, which is still in the vendor branch and not in a separate RELENG_4 branch :-/ Hmmm, you're right. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020630022849.GA731>