Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:52:53 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Mario Goebbels <mariog@tomservo.cc>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: About GEOM... Message-ID: <20020704092253.GW75946@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20020704191641.C21375-100000@gamplex.bde.org> References: <12909.1025704072@critter.freebsd.dk> <20020704191641.C21375-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 4 July 2002 at 19:20:00 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <20020703233109.B17974-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >>> This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating >>> working code to write a second system. >> >> Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second >> system, and I don't think the resources have been diverted as much >> as defected. >> >> Either way, I know you don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think >> I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we >> should stay stuck back there. > > I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards. I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who disagrees that devfs is a forward. It may need some improvement, but it's so much more logical than what we had before that I really think you should explain your objections. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020704092253.GW75946>