Date: 10 Jul 2002 12:38:15 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: rsi@panix.com Cc: "Artem Tepponen" <temik@egartech.com>, "Doug Barton" <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, "Garrett Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, <arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <xzpvg7nhnqg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <200207092230.g69MUZu18917@panix1.panix.com> References: <5235EF9BAE6B7F4CB3735789EEF73B296E614A@turtle.egar.egartech.com> <200207092230.g69MUZu18917@panix1.panix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> writes: > The only problem with the ports approach is that you have to have the > ports tree locally installed. # pkg_add -r porteasy # man porteasy DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvg7nhnqg.fsf>