Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 22:59:50 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: march/mcpu in bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <XFMail.20020801225950.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200208011533.56864.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01-Aug-2002 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I think, it is fairly easy to make it support all things _CPU_CFLAGS may > try to contain in the future. Whatever is being added to the _CPU_CFLAGS > (mmx, sse) can first be checked for. I don't. I think that you don't just have to block -march=foo, you may need to block any number of other '-mfoo' options that are architecture specific and that that will end up being very ugly and hard to maintain. > = CPUTYPE is optional, and part of CPUTYPE are the NO_CPU_CFLAGS and > = NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS variables which are very clearly documented right > = beside CPUTYPE in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf as I have already > = pointed out to you. > > You have. And I responded to you, that /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf > is fairly obscure, and that this flags are not (yet?) in make.conf(5) > and appeared long after the CFLAGS, which, on my machine, for example, > contained -march=pentiumpro for _years_. Funny that I don't have that response in my inbox. Anyways, CPUTYPE isn't documented in make.conf(5) at all and I suggested you do that. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020801225950.jhb>