Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance Message-ID: <15714.44930.665246.141549@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org> References: <15714.27671.533860.408996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820093939.B48541@iguana.icir.org> <15714.39494.661931.882244@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820132957.B49141@iguana.icir.org> <15714.43504.493596.791872@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20020820135849.B50369@iguana.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo writes: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > ... > > > hmmm... that seems to be in the noise (i assume you are dealing > > > with a fast machine), but probably because there is a lot of > ... > > This an SMP kernel using interrupts, not POLLING. And using the > ... > > Anyway, things max out at ~65K pkts/sec, so a few thousand > > pkts/second is a little better than in the noise. > > ok, i thought you had a lot higher packet rates. I seem to remember something like ~200K pkts/sec with our development branch code. Most are, naturally, dropped on the floor in an end-2-end configuration.. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15714.44930.665246.141549>