Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:56:26 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Munechika Sumikawa <sumikawa@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, <yasu@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Subject: Re: ports/40511: update for net/zebra (no-ipv6 option) Message-ID: <20020904125407.O49535-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020904.162655.113996435.sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there, On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Munechika Sumikawa wrote: MS> > net/zebra running under machine without INET6 produce annoying MS> > warnings about unability to access IPv6 sockets: MS> > MS> > 2002/07/13 01:36:23 ZEBRA: can't get ip6forwarding value MS> > 2002/07/13 01:36:23 ZEBRA: can't create router advertisement socket: Protocol not supported MS> MS> This is just warning as you say. I believe there is no impact to real MS> operation. MS> MS> I don't like WITHOUT_IPV6 approach because it does not make users MS> using binary package happy. Do you have any other idea? For example, MS> will you satisfy if the above warnings are just removed? As I mentioned, especially for binary packages, there would be useful to provide slave port with WITHOUT_IPV6 defined *and* with -nov6 or similar suffix. But, if you object slave port creation, removing the warning (or, better, reduce its severity) may be appropriate too. Thanks. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020904125407.O49535-100000>