Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 17:18:40 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named rejecting all kinds of serials Message-ID: <20020928151840.GV30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <200209281348.g8SDm0aQ085852@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <19116172.1033221870@tot.in.t-online.fr> <200209281348.g8SDm0aQ085852@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# olli@secnetix.de / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200:
> Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for
> anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible
> for zone files.
Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely recommended reading
for anybody who operates the BIND name server, because these RFCs
are very BIND specific. BIND is not DNS just like Sendmail is not
SMTP.
Your advice was actually very much to the point, Janine obviously
runs BIND. I just find it hilarious that RFCs are a viable way of
documenting an implementation (as opposed to a principle).
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
5:07PM up 11 days, 22 mins, 13 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.06, 0.01
end
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020928151840.GV30361>