Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:26:14 -0400 From: "MikeM" <myraq@mgm51.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible trojan since upgrade Message-ID: <200209291326140275.00B1A01B@home.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20020929040441.8105683@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> References: <20020929040441.8105683@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/28/2002 at 9:04 PM Andy Sparrow wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, MikeM wrote: >> >> > Do you mean the MX with the higher number, rather than lower number? >> > For my domain, my backup MX is priority 100, my main MX is priority 0. >> > Or do I have these critters set up backwards? > >Nope, you're good. > >BTW, I seem to recall that the Cricket Liu DNS book (might be the >Sendmail "Bat" book though) still advises not using an MX value of 0 for >the primary, due to some (unspecified, IIRC), broken MTAs. > >Never seen it cause a problem myself though... ... ============= So far, the 0 hasn't been a problem for me. But I'll bump it up a notch or two the next time I'm in the DNS config. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209291326140275.00B1A01B>