Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:03:03 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        Alex Zepeda <zipzippy@sonic.net>
Cc:        Daniel Rock <D.Rock@t-online.de>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Perl 5.8 broken in current
Message-ID:  <20021015000303.GB46774@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021014221225.GB13015@blarf.homeip.net>
References:  <3DAB2B21.5050205@t-online.de> <20021014204407.GA13015@blarf.homeip.net> <3DAB3F4A.60905@t-online.de> <20021014221225.GB13015@blarf.homeip.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:12:25PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote:
> 
> > But why don't show the same optimization levels on another intel 
> > platform (Solaris x86, gcc-3.2 release) no problem?
> 
> Because it's not the same compiler.  -current is not using 3.2.
> 
> $gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease)

Geez, there aren't _2_ orders of magnitude differences between 3.2.1 and
3.2[.0].  Do you really think the GCC guys would make 3.2.1 suck more
than 3.2?  Please give helpful suggestions, or don't give suggestions.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021015000303.GB46774>