Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:03:03 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Alex Zepeda <zipzippy@sonic.net> Cc: Daniel Rock <D.Rock@t-online.de>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl 5.8 broken in current Message-ID: <20021015000303.GB46774@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20021014221225.GB13015@blarf.homeip.net> References: <3DAB2B21.5050205@t-online.de> <20021014204407.GA13015@blarf.homeip.net> <3DAB3F4A.60905@t-online.de> <20021014221225.GB13015@blarf.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 03:12:25PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote: > > > But why don't show the same optimization levels on another intel > > platform (Solaris x86, gcc-3.2 release) no problem? > > Because it's not the same compiler. -current is not using 3.2. > > $gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease) Geez, there aren't _2_ orders of magnitude differences between 3.2.1 and 3.2[.0]. Do you really think the GCC guys would make 3.2.1 suck more than 3.2? Please give helpful suggestions, or don't give suggestions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021015000303.GB46774>