Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Oct 2002 03:38:43 -0400
From:      AlanE <alane@geeksrus.net>
To:        Ying-Chieh Liao <ijliao@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Alan Eldridge <alane@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake/files patch-Makefile.in patch-aa patch-ab patch-aclocal.in patch-ad patch-automake.texi
Message-ID:  <20021015073843.GA89745@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
In-Reply-To: <20021015065725.GA62934@terry.dragon2.net>
References:  <200210150652.g9F6qYnr027863@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021015065725.GA62934@terry.dragon2.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:57:25PM +0800, Ying-Chieh Liao wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 23:52:34 -0700, Alan Eldridge wrote:
>>   Added files:
>>     devel/automake/files patch-Makefile.in patch-aclocal.in 
>>                          patch-automake.texi 
>>   Removed files:
>>     devel/automake/files patch-aa patch-ab patch-ad 
>>   Log:
>>   Renamed patch files to sensible names.
>
>why not repo-copy ?

For three patch files I didn't think it was worth it. I'm doing the same
thing in the autoconf ports. None have much history, and what history
is/was there isn't terribly relevant... that is, not like Makefile
changes etc. It really comes down to a judgement call, and I'm the
maintainer of the whole auto* pile of <whatever>, and if I don't see any
value in it, then it's not worth the bother to myself and to the others
involved.

-- 
Alan Eldridge
Unix/C(++) IT Pro, 20 yrs, seeking new employment.
(http://wwweasel.geeksrus.net/~alane/resume.txt)
KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021015073843.GA89745>