Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:19:44 +0200 From: Anders Andersson <anders@hack.org> To: alane@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake/files patch-Makefile.in patch-aa patch-ab patch-aclocal.in patch-ad patch-automake.texi Message-ID: <20021015091944.GA649@sushi.sanyusan.se> In-Reply-To: <20021015073843.GA89745@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <200210150652.g9F6qYnr027863@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021015065725.GA62934@terry.dragon2.net> <20021015073843.GA89745@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:38:43AM -0400, AlanE wrote: > For three patch files I didn't think it was worth it. I'm doing the same > thing in the autoconf ports. None have much history, and what history > is/was there isn't terribly relevant... that is, not like Makefile > changes etc. It really comes down to a judgement call, and I'm the > maintainer of the whole auto* pile of <whatever>, and if I don't see any > value in it, then it's not worth the bother to myself and to the others > involved. I dont understand this reasoning, since I think it would be valuable to have the history of these sort of critical ports even in the future. We can't rely on you being the maintainer forever. -- Anders Andersson <anders at hack.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021015091944.GA649>