Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:40:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports for any BSD (Was: Re: About the recent PORTCOMMENT issue.) Message-ID: <20021113144000.B3948@citusc.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021113132918.GA48165@iib.unsam.edu.ar>; from fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar on Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:18AM -0300 References: <20021112210027.2e8c4e5a.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <20021113041525.GE80589@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20021113132918.GA48165@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 10:29:18AM -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: > +----[ Esto dijo Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org): > | > | On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:00:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > | > | > but I think it would be beneficial for both to adopt a common (or at > | > least very similar) ports scheme. > |=20 > | They have diverged too much to simply just change over to using > | theirs: both systems have features the other does not, leading to much > | pain, confusion and anger in the user community if we just switched. > | > +----] >=20 > Has anyone heard of openpackages yet? (www.openpackages.org) Nice idea, but it never got off the ground. Kris --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE90tS/Wry0BWjoQKURAvc4AKDi7HbU0ufCxIfZFVeSOkXgDMIz6wCg+eRp D1ZXZwweZJ93o/qOYv6xwKs= =rIQw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --98e8jtXdkpgskNou-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021113144000.B3948>