Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:00:25 +0200
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To:        Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS on sparc64
Message-ID:  <20021204120025.GS365@straylight.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20021204111948.12373.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
References:  <20021127155317.GG375@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20021203155143.22703.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <20021203204611.GA38099@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20021204110420.GO365@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20021204111948.12373.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:19:26AM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wr=
ote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:03:58PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:46:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:51:21PM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferre=
ira wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > 	Well, I apologize if I say something stupid but if a port requires
> > > > pthread support... not linking against it won't make the port work.=
 It might
> > > > not even get the port to compile.
> > > > 	Wouldn't be better if a stub (with no internal code) version
> > > > of libc_r was cooked specially for sparc64? Just to see if the ports
> > > > build in that ARCH? Since nothing will really work until we have a
> > > > working thread implemention for sparc64.
> > >=20
> > > I think we can just let them fail for now, unless they have a switch
> > > that lets them build w/o threads support.
> >=20
> > Okay then, how about the attached minimalistic patch for the mhash port?
> > It builds and works just fine on sparc64 without the -lc_r linker optio=
n.
>=20
> 	If you're certain it works without thread support, by all
> means commit :)
> 	The patch looks clean.

Well, I would, but we are in a ports freeze, so I am asking for approval
from portmgr@ :)

G'luck,
Peter

--=20
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net	roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
I am jealous of the first word in this sentence.

--ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE97e5Z7Ri2jRYZRVMRAoL2AJwODfRHP1argtUbfgJWA8rWTBDgRQCfeICR
IFkDeBBQFUnE0imxjNVgqqQ=
=eS0U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZUxj+kVYsk1YKJSS--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021204120025.GS365>