Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:35:12 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ia64@FreeBSD.ORG, anholt@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86-libraries fails on ia64 Message-ID: <20030118223512.GA590@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030118215524.GF70151@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030116012828.GA27790@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030116014854.GA22020@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030118215524.GF70151@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 01:55:24PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 05:48:54PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Alternative 1:
> > --- extras/FreeType/lib/ttcalc.c.orig Sat Feb 12 21:03:51 2000
> > +++ extras/FreeType/lib/ttcalc.c Mon Dec 2 00:39:32 2002
> > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
> > - z = (unsigned INT64)z >> 1;
> > + z = (unsigned long long)z >> 1;
>
> > Alternative 2:
> > --- extras/FreeType/lib/ttcalc.c.orig Sat Feb 12 21:03:51 2000
> > +++ extras/FreeType/lib/ttcalc.c Thu Dec 5 17:56:25 2002
> > @@ -84,7 +84,11 @@
> > +#if defined(__ia64__)
> > + z = (unsigned long)z >> 1;
> > +#else
> > z = (unsigned INT64)z >> 1;
> > +#endif
>
>
> This looks like a total hack (at first glance). Why isn't INT64 usable?
> Is there a missing ia64 case in the definition of it?
The problem is that gcc doesn't allow modifying typedefs in casts.
INT64 does exist, but unsigned INT64 is not accepted as a valid cast.
Try:
typedef long long LL;
int main()
{
LL s = 2;
unsigned long long u = (unsigned LL)s;
return 0;
}
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030118223512.GA590>