Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:26:18 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        "Brian J. McGovern" <bmcgover@cisco.com>
Cc:        qa@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/39311: you can't enable inetd in sysinstall without editing inetd.conf 
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030206092542.84063A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <200302061417.h16EHN0H032218@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Brian J. McGovern wrote:

> Is this such a bad thing, as nothing is enabled by default?

If the user asks for inetd to be enabled, it shouldn't be enabled?

Remember that in upgrade and post-install configuration scenarios, they
may have services enabled in inetd.conf, and just want to twiddle inetd on
and off.

> 
> This would seem to be a "Yes, we want it to work this way" situation.
> 
>  > Synopsis: you can't enable inetd in sysinstall without editing inetd.conf
>  > 
>  > Responsible-Changed-From-To: qa->rwatson
>  > Responsible-Changed-By: rwatson
>  > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 5 15:29:55 PST 2003
>  > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
>  > Claimed, testing patch and will commit shortly.
>  > 
>  > 
>  > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=39311
>  > 
>  > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>  > with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030206092542.84063A-100000>