Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:34:36 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does the patching procedure work? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20030305122841.02c8b7b0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030305192635.GA23113@madman.celabo.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030305121248.02c5e720@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305100150.048518c0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305052142.03f04200@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305050739.03f078f0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305052142.03f04200@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305100150.048518c0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030305121248.02c5e720@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:26 PM 3/5/2003, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: >At that time, RELENG_4_5 was already `over' under both the old and new >policy. I just checked, and it is just *barely* over that age. A lot of us installed -p2 or -p3, though, and then patched what needed to be patched on that particular server. It'd be nice to have a "diff"-style patch that worked, though the fixed binary for 4.6 does work. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20030305122841.02c8b7b0>