Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:54:09 +0000 From: Robin.Melville@nadt.org.uk To: Eric L Howard <elh@outreachnetworks.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <78A61AED-5100-11D7-B150-00039303F496@nadt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030307202935.GA487@outreachnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 08:29 pm, Eric L Howard wrote: > At a certain time, now past [Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:19:49PM -0400], > Marc G. Fournier spake thusly: >> [...] Bugs do get fixed in the release branch, just depends on the >> severity. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > > That said... > > My case [I've had wonderful success running the release branch] is no > weightier than yours [you've had wonderful success running -STABLE]. > Too > many details left out... Yes, me too. Not huge numbers of jails/terabyte file systems, etc... but crunching a large department with biggish clinical databases, intranet, windows/mac networking/printing, email, network glue etc, etc... on a couple of 586 class servers with uptimes of over 365 days and excellent response times throughout the entire period. I really don't have any complaints about the stability of FreeBSD-STABLE. Robin Melville Addiction Information Nottingham Alcohol & Drug Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78A61AED-5100-11D7-B150-00039303F496>