Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:58:19 +0100 From: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes Message-ID: <xzpznnuq2xw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030316234507.GK3819@elvis.mu.org> (Maxime Henrion's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 00:45:07 %2B0100") References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpllzfctbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030316234507.GK3819@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> writes: > I don't like it. I don't want yet another knob to be added in every > damn Makefile in the tree. We should warn by default for these things. > Since we adopted GCC3 and often use C99 features these days, it seems > clear C99 should be the default standard for warnings. So put 'CSTD?=c99' in /etc/make.conf and let those of us who are more interested in parking our bikes than in admiring the paint job get on with our lives. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpznnuq2xw.fsf>