Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 12:35:44 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: wes@softweyr.com Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig question Message-ID: <20030330.123544.51948571.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200303301128.09717.wes@softweyr.com> References: <20030329.195108.133248709.imp@bsdimp.com> <200303301128.09717.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200303301128.09717.wes@softweyr.com>
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes:
: Only if the spec says those are the only valid ranges. Then we have to
: keep up to date with changes in the spec, too. Either some simple sanity
: checks or checking for truly valid lengths -- 0, 40 bits, 128 bits --
: makes even better sense.
128 bits isn't a valid length either. Only 40 and 104 bits, which we
currently semi-bogusly report as 64-bit and 128-bit.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030330.123544.51948571.imp>