Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:17:27 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en Makefile www/en/conspectus Makefile Makefile.inc README index.sgml www/en/conspectus/advocacy Makefile Makefile.inc www/en/conspectus/advocacy/2000 Makefile Makefile.inc index.sgml www/en/conspectus/advocacy/2000/11 05.sgml 12.sgml ... Message-ID: <20030410091727.3395487a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030410005533.GZ79923@perrin.int.nxad.com> References: <200304092345.h39Njx9K066928@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030410082006.2f4f748b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030410005533.GZ79923@perrin.int.nxad.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:55:33 -0700 Sean Chittenden <seanc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > > > The conspectus was well intentioned, but hasn't been touched in three > > > years. If someone feels passionately about these bits and wants to > > > ressurect summarizing hot topics/discussions (similar to what PostgreSQL > > > or Ruby does for their weekly news), so be it, but this content is just > > > too dated to be of any use. > > > > > > > Where was this discussed? I don't remember ever reading a thread > > about this. > > Only nudged in private by Ceri to finish the job. I was going to wait > a week to see if anyone kibitzed about me removing the link from the > support page, but patience got the better of me and I nuked the files > because they were dated ~2000 and the content was completely out of > date/useless for "modern" FreeBSD users. -sc > > -- > Sean Chittenden > Well I am upset, but for reasons not related to FreeBSD. I'll discuss this later. Just wish it was more openly discussed, perhaps requesting someone work on it. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030410091727.3395487a.trhodes>