Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:13:44 -0400 From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Martin McCormick <martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I Created an Interesting Permission Problem. Message-ID: <3E9D9D58.8090209@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200304161610.h3GGAKgx091477@dc.cis.okstate.edu> References: <200304161610.h3GGAKgx091477@dc.cis.okstate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin McCormick wrote: > Bill Moran writes: >>You should really "reply all" to keep this on the mailing list. > > Good point. > >>Perhaps the default behaviour of one of the programs you used in the >>script has changed. It might help if you provided the script to the >>list. > > I can make it easier than that. Let's say I am in one of the > user directories that can't su to root. To demonstrate the new > behavior, > > $ ls >/tmp/testfile > $ mv /tmp/testfile . > mv: ./testfile: set owner/group (was: 1003/0): Operation not permitted > > That's all you need to make it happen. I'm replying so you don't think I'm ignoring you ;) I've spent some time playing with this and I can't reproduce it on my machines. I also don't have any more guesses (other than the setuid/gid guess I made earlier) I'll try to find more time to try things out today, but if you find the solution, please post it so we all know what happened. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E9D9D58.8090209>