Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new NSS Message-ID: <200304181517.h3IFHmRZ096678@strings.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030417211205.GC28037@dan.emsphone.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030417202921.23691M-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20030418032146.GF28037@dan.emsphone.com>, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> wrote: > > Right; very few programs actually would need to be converted to > dynamic. But John brought up a totally dynamic system, which I think > would be a bad idea, performance-wise. No, I did not bring it up. Max brought it up. I have already sat through this discussion at least twice before, so I know exactly how it will end. A thread of around 100 messages will build up, and then finally everybody will get bored with it. You all could save a lot of typing by going back to the archives and finding out that all the arguments pro and con have already been made. And you could save me a lot of mouse clicking by TRIMMING THE DAMN CC LIST thankyouverymuch. :-) John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304181517.h3IFHmRZ096678>