Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:33:09 +0200
From:      Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: new target to display options
Message-ID:  <20030418163309.GA64856@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20030418160126.GA97618@rot13.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20030418101304.GF20941@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20030418160126.GA97618@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# kris@obsecurity.org / 2003-04-18 09:01:26 -0700:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:13:04PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > various ports display messages informing the user that they can use
> > WITH_THIS or WITHOUT_THAT. these messages are put into pre-everything,
> > pre-fetch, post-fetch... How about a new target, say, "options"?
> 
> See my dialog-based config patches I posted a while back.  When I can
> find the time I need to make some minor changes and commit them.

    I've read the thread on MARC, but didn't study the code. Will it
    force me to configure ports through dialogs? I *really* hope that's
    not the case.

    Anyway, all I wanted was a better way to handle displaying options
    to the user, nothing more.

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030418163309.GA64856>