Date: 19 Apr 2003 10:53:22 +0200 From: Alex Kiesel <alex.kiesel@document-root.de> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new target to display options Message-ID: <1050742402.237.2.camel@detention.home.ahk> In-Reply-To: <20030418162439.GA1052@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030418101304.GF20941@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20030418122910.5a39bb44.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20030418162439.GA1052@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 18:24, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:29:10PM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > > pre-fetch, post-fetch... How about a new target, say, "options"? > > > > I would like it. I also suggest to create a "standard" how those > > option-messages have to look. Maybe it's better to create a variable which > > get parsed like: > > > > PORT_OPTIONS= WITHOUT_X11:To build the port w/o X11 support \ > > WITH_PNG:To build the port with PNG support > > > > See also mail/mailman & emulators/xmame for an alternate implementation. I think those two are a little bit too verbose :) and they are not parseable. I think it would be nice to have parseable output that you could easily use in some kind of frontend... Generally this target is a very good idea. Greets, -Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1050742402.237.2.camel>