Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:10:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> To: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstack protector Message-ID: <20030419211017.GA51146@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030419094540.V87664@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com> References: <20030411111302.G4749@cvs.imp.ch> <20030411115522.I6045@odysseus.silby.com> <20030418173713.C87664@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com> <20030419081650.GA92898@xor.obsecurity.org> <20030419094540.V87664@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:52:34AM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Yes, it was to do with module loading. I think the XFree86 module > > build ignored CFLAGS, so the modules were not built with > > -fstack-protector. > > The modules use MODCFLAGS and MODULE_CFLAGS instead. I'm familair with > the XFree86 loader, and would be willing to work with someone familiar with > the -fstack-protector part to fix this. Hmm, OK. From the point of view of the FreeBSD port this is a POLA violation..it should just use CFLAGS like everything else is supposed to. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+obs5Wry0BWjoQKURAmumAJsHJAMkPUYd3Na4T+LBhpiT0QvHjgCg9vv+ nzyF4N7liTPYL5rYPsewv5g= =WlXU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030419211017.GA51146>