Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:14:18 +0200 From: Antoine Jacoutot <ajacoutot@lphp.org> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw dynamic rule timeout Message-ID: <200304300914.18382.ajacoutot@lphp.org> In-Reply-To: <20030430045856.GA23926@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <200304271259.02025.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <200304300100.42983.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20030430045856.GA23926@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 06:58, Crist J. Clark wrote: > I think several of the articles point to the easiest solution: Don't > use keep-state rules in conjunction with natd(8). Keep-state doesn't > offer you anything more than using natd(8) with stateless rules for > the vast majority of policies. Yes, thanks, that's what I though too. I guess I'll just have to write a new "stateless" ruleset (I always used keep-state). Regards. Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304300914.18382.ajacoutot>