Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:17:21 -0400 From: Chris Pepper <pepper@reppep.com> To: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-docs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "PROGRAMLISTING", "TITLE" not permitted Message-ID: <p06000f17bad5a783fe05@[129.85.219.160]> In-Reply-To: <20030430155930.GA20596@eborcom.com> References: <20030428183759.M89408@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to> <20030430090032.GL32395@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <p06000f03bad57faba77a@[129.85.219.160]> <20030430155930.GA20596@eborcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doh, sorry. Chris At 4:59 PM +0100 2003/04/30, Tom Hukins wrote: >On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >> At 10:00 AM +0100 2003/04/30, Nik Clayton wrote: >> >> >[1] > > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/writing-style.html#AEN3228 >> >> A good reference, but it confuses me a bit. According to >> "Content within elements should be indented by two spaces if the >> content runs over more than one line.", shouldn't the 'which' inside >> the <emphasis> be indented two more spaces, or should it say "Content >> within BLOCK elements"? > >No, because the content of <emphasis> does not run over more than one >line. > >I agree that this particular paragraph could be written more clearly, >though. I tried to improve it recently, but I don't feel completely >happy with the changes I made. -- Chris Pepper: <http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/>; Rockefeller University: <http://www.rockefeller.edu/>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06000f17bad5a783fe05>