Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 May 2003 18:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Justin C. Sherrill" <justin@shiningsilence.com>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
Subject:   Re: load balance ordinary traffic
Message-ID:  <1051.192.168.0.251.1053039362.squirrel@home.shiningsilence.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030515213812.GA8905@pit.databus.com>
References:  <49537.24.93.1.61.1053029897.squirrel@home.shiningsilence.com>  <20030515213812.GA8905@pit.databus.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is unlikely to work with cable modems.  You're already competing
> with your immendiate neighbors for a fixed pie of cable bandwidth.

It'll work just fine; the shared cable line supplies far more bandwidth
than what several modems will eat, and this area is not oversubscribed. 
Also, I have a mix of modems - some DOCSIS, some older proprietary
Motorola, which use different parts of the broadcast spectrum, and so do
not affect each other's bandwidth, directly.

> However, what you can't do is have
> a single TCP connection on a single local host use both external lines.

How about multiple TCP connections on a single local host using multiple
lines?  I know I could stick particular local machines to a particular
network gateway, but at that point I could just hook them up directly to
individual modems.

> That would require at a minimum cooperation from your ISP which they
> are most unlikely to provide.

I work at my ISP.  What's the cooperation bit?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1051.192.168.0.251.1053039362.squirrel>