Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 21:35:41 +0200 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kris@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: ports/devel/avr-libc Makefile] Message-ID: <20030518213541.A83300@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20030518211942.A82981@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from j@uriah.heep.sax.de on Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:19:42PM %2B0200 References: <20030518123413.GS95437@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030518201405.I4687@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030518211942.A82981@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > > FYI. Please see http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-full/ for > > > the failure log. > > > > There is no failure log for avr-libc. So what? > > I see that the last update timestamp on the above URL is May 06, so > perhaps you've got a more recent log somewhere? OK, i found the log on bento. It still tries to apply that @$%!&ing CPU CFLAG crap to my cross compilation. I'm sick of that pessimization now! I've already got MAKE_ENV= NO_CPU_CFLAGS=true in avr-libc/Makefile (long since), that is what i have been told would do the trick to get around that braindeadness. I wish that CPU_CFLAGS hack had never seen the FreeBSD tree, seriously. It gains nothing but trouble. I still don't see why the people couldn't just add -mcpu=myverynicecpuneedsthattweak to their own /etc/make.conf instead of all that trouble, if they really believe that 1.5 % speed gain in a certain benchmark would help them anything. So whoever broke this again is IMHO also responsible for fixing all the dependent software he broke (i. e., walk the entire ports collection, test-compile it, and adjust accordingly). Sorry, i'm quite upset about that now. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030518213541.A83300>