Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:04:11 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Frank Bonnet <bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "su" bug ( diff of pam.d ) Message-ID: <xzpsmr93mms.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030520104417.A4110@bart.esiee.fr> (Frank Bonnet's message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 10:44:17 %2B0200") References: <20030519110242.A21561@bart.esiee.fr> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030519144004.59393I-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030520104417.A4110@bart.esiee.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Frank Bonnet <bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr> writes: > 11c11 > < auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass > --- >> auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so If you're using nss_ldap, you can safely use pam_unix instead of pam_ldap. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsmr93mms.fsf>