Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 08:24:34 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Frank Bonnet <bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr> Subject: Re: 5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap Message-ID: <xzp4r3mxjrx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030523060846.GC17107@sunbay.com> (Ruslan Ermilov's message of "Fri, 23 May 2003 09:08:46 %2B0300") References: <20030522184631.A23366@bart.esiee.fr> <xzp65o2zkhf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030522224850.GK87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzpof1uy28n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030523060846.GC17107@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes: > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes: > > > I'm unfamiliar with ["binding"]. What's it do? > > It behaves like "sufficient" should, i.e. failure is not ignored. > You mean, _last_ failure is not ignored? I don't understand the question. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4r3mxjrx.fsf>