Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:13 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Heiko Schaefer <hschaefer@fto.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gbde performance question Message-ID: <8062.1053683893@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 May 2003 11:07:28 %2B0200." <20030523110255.A78432@daneel.foundation.hs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030523110255.A78432@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes: >loopaes seems to beat gbde's throughput by a factor from what i hear. >assuming that gbde is not computationally more complex by that factor, it >would be nice to be on par :) In all likelyhood, loopaes does more or less the same thing as "cjd" in OpenBSD, and that won't keep your data safe for 10 years in my estimate. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8062.1053683893>