Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:52:09 -0500 From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com> To: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> Cc: hackers at FreeBSD <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Backporting burncd w/VCD support to 4.5-REL-p24 Message-ID: <20030609175209.GA14663@sheol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20030609174545.GL1203@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> References: <20030609170825.GA14499@sheol.localdomain> <200306091724.h59HOW2b008475@spider.deepcore.dk> <20030609174545.GL1203@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 09, at 01:45 PM, The Anarcat wrote:
>
> On Mon Jun 09, 2003 at 07:24:32PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > > Lemme ask you this, then: Given a FBSD 4.5 system, is the CAM xpt
> > > module patch (T. Quinot) and cdrecord a [more] viable option? Or am
> > > I basically SOOL?
>
> I've used the ATAPICAM throughout the 4.x branch and now in 5.x
> without any problems, really enjoying all of cdrecord power.
Um, just to clarify: FBSD 4.6 was the first release with ATAPICAM
(I _think_ it was 4.6, but definitely not 4.5). Are you saying that
FBSD 4.6 was nice and solid?
More to the point, had you applied that CAM xpt patch to a 4.5 (or
earlier) release? And solid reliability continued?
Thanks for the reply,
Dave
--
______________________ ______________________
\__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/
\________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/
http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030609175209.GA14663>