Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      17 Jun 2003 21:49:59 -0400
From:      Chris Shenton <chris@shenton.org>
To:        Vlad GALU <vladg@vipnet.ro>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: POP daemon
Message-ID:  <878ys09mt4.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030617194111.1e79eb78.vladg@vipnet.ro>
References:  <20030616105955.U11598@metafocus.net> <004601c334ed$d3381f70$0200a8c0@cp14275a> <20030617194111.1e79eb78.vladg@vipnet.ro>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vlad GALU <vladg@vipnet.ro> writes:

> 	I can't complain about qmail-pop3d either. Does wonders,
> but you have to use qmail though :)

Agreed about qmail's pop3d.  All of the qmail suite has a very good
history of security.

But you don't *have* to use qmail's smtpd and MTA, but you will have
to use a Maildir mailbox format -- it's what pop3d reads.

You can actually configure sendmail to deliver to Maildirs using the
"maildrop" program and I understand recent "procmail" can do this too
-- configure sendmail to use these instead of the regular local
delivery agent.

I prefer qmail but if you feel compelled to use sendmail, this is an
option.  Also, single-mailbox-file-per-user will *always* be slow for
POP users who want to leave a bunch of mail on server.  This kills
qpopper, ancient or modern versions.  Maildir's one-message-per-file
makes this easy since it doesn't have to rewrite a big mailbox file
all the time.  

Other MTAs like courier understand Maildir natively.

And if you're looking for an IMAP server which is Maildir-aware, I
like courier's imapd, available separately from the entire courier
suite, if you want to combine qmail with courier-imapd.  They're all
in the ports, /usr/mail/*.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?878ys09mt4.fsf>