Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:21:22 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: nork@FreeBSD.org Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] CPUTYPE reflects to FFLAGS in bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <20030617.232122.14843602.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200306180510.h5I5Ai1J055092@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> References: <200306171629.h5HGTK1I036487@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> <20030617.162248.133289574.imp@bsdimp.com> <200306180510.h5I5Ai1J055092@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200306180510.h5I5Ai1J055092@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp>
Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:22:48 -0600 (MDT)
: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
: > : -FFLAGS ?= -O
: > : +FFLAGS ?= ${CFLAGS}
: > +FFLAGS ?= ${CFLAGS:C/-std=[a-z:0-9]+//}}
: > : .endif
: > : EFLAGS ?=
: > might be better.
:
: Aha! -std=c99 (etc..) is only C feature.
Yes. That's right. -std= might be used for other languages, but its
meaning would be totally different for each of them.
: I see. I'll send-pr this fix. (or anyone, commit this!)
I'll add it to my tree, and hopefully commit it soon.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617.232122.14843602.imp>