Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:37:05 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: scanf(3) patch for C99-conformant FP parsing Message-ID: <20030624143705.GB86804@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030624132552.GA33228@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030624114418.GA58305@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030624124233.GA83552@nagual.pp.ru> <20030624132552.GA33228@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:25:52 -0700, David Schultz wrote: > That's what I was worried about. I believe that's okay by the > standard as long as isalnum() still accepts *at least* > [a-z][A-Z][0-9] in any locale. Is this a valid assumption or do I > need to test by hand? Yes, *at least* is guaranteed, we have only ASCII-compatible locales and will never have other ones, due to big problems with C own internal charset, etc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030624143705.GB86804>